Fitch Ratings has affirmed all classes of
In addition, Fitch has affirmed the rating for the 2017
RATING ACTIONS
Entity / Debt
Rating
Prior
MOA 2020-HR2 E
E-RR 90217BAA3
LT
BBB-sf
Affirmed
BBB-sf
MSC 2017-HR2
A-3 61691NAD7
LT
AAAsf
Affirmed
AAAsf
A-4 61691NAE5
LT
AAAsf
Affirmed
AAAsf
A-S 61691NAH8
LT
AAAsf
Affirmed
AAAsf
A-SB 61691NAC9
LT
AAAsf
Affirmed
AAAsf
B 61691NAJ4
LT
AA-sf
Affirmed
AA-sf
C 61691NAK1
LT
A-sf
Affirmed
A-sf
D 61691NAN5
LT
BBB-sf
Affirmed
BBB-sf
Page
of 2
VIEW ADDITIONAL RATING DETAILS
KEY RATING DRIVERS
Criteria Update: The rating actions reflect the impact of Fitch’s updated ‘
The affirmations reflect the impact of the criteria and generally stable performance of the pool since the prior rating action. Fitch’s current ratings incorporate a ‘Bsf’ rating case loss of 4.86%.
Five loans (16.06%) have been identified as Fitch Loans of Concern (FLOCs). All loans in the pool are current and there are no loans in special servicing.
The largest driver to expected loss is the 260-272 Meserole loan (2.97%), secured by a five-story commercial loft and retail building totaling 70,425-sf located in the East Williamsburg neighborhood of
Fitch’s loss expectations of 33.53% (prior to concentration adjustments) reflects a 10% stress to the YE 2022 NOI and a 10% cap rate.
The second largest driver to expected losses is
Fitch’s ‘Bsf’ rating case loss of 11.86% (prior to concentration adjustments) is based on a 9% cap rate and a 40% stress to the YE 2022 NOI to reflect reduced rental income and higher vacancy.
The third largest driver to expected losses is
Fitch’s ‘Bsf’ rating case loss of 26.6% (prior to concentration adjustments) reflects a stressed cap rate of 11% to account for the property quality and suburban location and a 15% stress to the YE 2022 NOI to reflect the increased portfolio vacancy.
Increasing Credit Enhancement: CE has increased since the prior rating action due to amortization and paydown and defeasance. The pool’s outstanding balance has been reduced by 14.4% since issuance. Since the prior rating action, one loan has been disposed. Three loans(3.50%) have been defeased since issuance. No realized losses have incurred to date. Zero loans are in special servicing and/or delinquent.
RATING SENSITIVITIES
Factors that Could, Individually or Collectively, Lead to Negative Rating Action/Downgrade
Downgrades to A-1 through B and the associated IO class X-A are not likely due to the continued expected amortization, position in the capital structure and sufficient CE relative to loss expectations, but may occur should interest shortfalls affect these classes.
Downgrades to classes C, D, X-B and X-D may occur should expected losses for the pool increase substantially from continued underperformance of the FLOCs, particularly 260-272 Meserole and
Downgrades to classes E-RR, F-RR, G-RR, H-RR and pass through MOA 2020-HR2 E-RR will occur with a greater certainty of loss from continued performance decline of the FLOCs and/or loans transfer to special servicing.
Factors that Could, Individually or Collectively, Lead to Positive Rating Action/Upgrade
Factors that could lead to upgrades would include stable to improved asset performance, coupled with additional paydown and/or defeasance. Upgrades to the ‘A-sf’ and ‘AA-sf’ rated classes would likely occur if the performance of the FLOCs stabilizes or if there is significant improvement in CE and/or defeasance; however, adverse selection and increased concentrations, or further underperformance or default of the FLOCs could cause this trend to reverse.
Upgrades to the ‘BBB-sf’ and ‘BBBsf’ rated classes are considered unlikely and would be limited based on the sensitivity to concentrations or the potential for future concentrations. Classes would not be upgraded above ‘Asf’ if there were likelihood of interest shortfalls. Upgrades to the ‘BB-sf’ and ‘B-sf’ rated classes are not likely until the later years in the transaction and only if the performance of the remaining pool is stable and/or there is sufficient CE to the bonds.
USE OF THIRD PARTY DUE DILIGENCE PURSUANT TO SEC RULE 17G -10
Form ABS Due Diligence-15E was not provided to, or reviewed by, Fitch in relation to this rating action.
REFERENCES FOR SUBSTANTIALLY MATERIAL SOURCE CITED AS KEY DRIVER OF RATING
The principal sources of information used in the analysis are described in the Applicable Criteria.
ESG Considerations
The highest level of ESG credit relevance is a score of ‘3’, unless otherwise disclosed in this section. A score of ‘3’ means ESG issues are credit-neutral or have only a minimal credit impact on the entity, either due to their nature or the way in which they are being managed by the entity. Fitch’s ESG Relevance Scores are not inputs in the rating process; they are an observation on the relevance and materiality of ESG factors in the rating decision. For more information on Fitch’s ESG Relevance Scores, visit https://www.fitchratings.com/topics/esg/products#esg-relevance-scores.
Additional information is available on www.fitchratings.com
Read the full article here